« Climate Lawsuits Ahoy | Main | Knock and Drag »


Two reports out this week hint at a new political alignment in the coming decades. Both reports focus on nanotechnology, but have implications well beyond.

Research at the University of Wisconsin-Madison shows a strong correlation between moral doubts about nanotechnology and embrace of religion.

In the United States and a few European countries where religion plays a larger role in everyday life, notably Italy, Austria and Ireland, nanotechnology and its potential to alter living organisms or even inspire synthetic life is perceived as less morally acceptable. In more secular European societies, such as those in France and Germany, individuals are much less likely to view nanotechnology through the prism of religion and find it ethically suspect.

"The level of 'religiosity' in a particular country is one of the strongest predictors of whether or not people see nanotechnology as morally acceptable," says Dietram Scheufele, a University of Wisconsin-Madison professor of life sciences communication and the lead author of the new study. "Religion was the strongest influence over everything."

At the same time, Yale researchers have determined that doubts about nanotechnology align with larger cultural views about commerce and equality.

The determining factor in how people responded was their cultural values, according to Dan Kahan, the Elizabeth K. Dollard Professor at Yale Law School and lead author of the study. "People who had more individualistic, pro-commerce values, tended to infer that nanotechnology is safe," said Kahan, "while people who are more worried about economic inequality read the same information as implying that nanotechnology is likely to be dangerous."

According to Kahan, this pattern is consistent with studies examining how people's cultural values influence their perceptions of environmental and technological risks generally. "In sum, when they learned about a new technology, people formed reactions to it that matched their views of risks like climate change and nuclear waste disposal," he said.

This combination shatters the Right-Left stereotype that dominate American politics. Religiosity is typically seen as conservative, while worries about economic inequality fall into the liberal bucket. Yet both map to strong concerns about nanotechnology.

(It's important here to note that "nanotechnology" has been somewhat corrupted as a useful term, and gets used to mean everything from dumb nanoscale particles to scary Drexlerian nanobots, often without clear distinction. It's unclear, without access to the relevant journal articles, how nanotechnology is defined in these studies.)

If the opinions uncovered in these surveys does map to larger views on science and technology, it suggests the shape that a new political alignment might take. Party politics aren't static; partisan evolution means more than just flipping which party means "right wing" and which one means "left wing." There could well be a reshuffling of positions in the coming decades, especially if religious evangelicals begin to see faith-as-stewardship as being more important than faith-as-moral judgment.

One pair of surveys does not necessary portend a massive cultural shift, but it does offer a distant early warning of a possible change. This is definitely worth watching.


The cat is out of the bag.

Fear of a thing does not reduce the human capacity to develop it.

Jamais: I wanted to remark that I find it harder to read your posts now due to the reformatting that makes the text smaller. Feel free to delete this after reading.

Interesting posts, as always.

Echoing Michael in saying that there's something weird with the font on my system.

And I thought this linked in nicely with your thoughts;

"A fixture in Washington for nearly three decades, Cizik has played a key role in bringing evangelical Christian concerns to the political table. But in recent years, he earned enemies in the movement for pushing to broaden the evangelical agenda. His strongest focus was on "creation care," arguing that evangelicals have a biblical responsibility to the environment that includes combatting global warming."

I changed the font recently (and a few other minor format tweaks); I've now bumped it up a bit. Is it better for you now?

Interesting data point - basically fits the dynamist / stasist typology put forward by Virginia Postrel around 2000.

Technology is, of course, amoral (except for nuclear weapons - those are pure evil.)

To compare with a slightly riper emergent technology, I think much of the distrust of genetically modified foods derives from the fact that the big players in charge of "designing" the things are massive corporations out to make money. Which, if perpetual financial (and climate!) crises have taught us anything, can be a recipe for disaster. As well, Monsanto is made up of thugs.

Nano is going to happen whether people want it to or not (as another commenter pointed out), but whether it will be popularly supported or not will depend, at least in part, on trust. (Trust that it will not exist purely for the benefit of the rich, that shoddy nanoparticles will not lodge themselves in our lungs and give us cancer, and so on.)

So, we needed two studies to tell us that secular economic libertarians tend to love nanotechnology? I thought we already knew that from the example of the Extropian movement, which poofed! itself out of existence a few years ago. I suspect the Extropians gave up because a lot of them had reached their 40's and 50's, performed a middle-aged reality check and decided that the "immortality" they predicted for themselves doesn't seem likely to arrive in their remaining life expectancies.

This corresponds with my experience. It brings to mind a useful tool James Hughes threw together when explaining Democratic Transhumanism (here); a third political axis, which is essentially bio-nano-info technological conservatism/progressiveness.

I've met quite a few self-proclaimed hippies, and anyone who uses that term for his or herself shares some common views with most of the very religious - a trust beyond reverence for nature's (or God's) design, and an inherent distrust in any human challenge to those. Those groups share a far conservative end of a third axis of a modern political spectrum.


Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered By MovableType 4.37